Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family economy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus but likely a notable topic if thorough sourcing ever shows up. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Family economy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article reads like an original essay (or a book report for school). No references to back up any of the points raised. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:OR. Keep now references have come to light.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 02:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Rewrite This appears to be an actual term used in historical research, check Google Scholar (e.g., 1 2 ). That said the current article appears to just be someone's essay. --/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 02:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.   -- --/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 02:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.   -- --/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 02:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Rewrite per Mendaliv. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 03:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless much improved during AFD period - This is such a naive piece of writing as to be largely worthless. It reads like a 14 year old's school essay.  If retained at all it should be Renamed Medieval peasant family economy, as the present title does not reflect its content.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.