Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family tree of Aisha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Ordinarily this defaults to keep, but I'll make the purely editorial (not administrative) decision to follow the recommendation of those proposing a move, since it appears to address the concerns of thos worried that we'll turn into a genealogical database. Johnleemk | Talk 14:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Family tree of Aisha

 * Delete non-encyclopedic, one source which hurts it meeting WP:V. Formatting and composition very bad. Jersey Devil 07:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment User Jersey Devil appears to be on the war path against User Striver by proposing all articles created by the latter for deletion. Sad. Lambiam 17:05, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. We don't need a family tree of every single companion of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Pepsidrinka 07:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC) Move per Green Giant below. Pepsidrinka 01:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no genealogy database. Gazpacho 10:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * delete WP:NOT a genealogy tree Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Bad formatting and composition are opportunities for an editor to do some constructive work by improving an article.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  22:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above --Khoikhoi 06:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep because she was his wife, not a random companion. Ardric47 00:46, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Aisha. Zain 02:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Articles for deletion/Family tree of Uthman ibn Affan, she is royalty, main article already to long.--Striver 15:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Move to a new First Muslim Dynasty article for similar reasons I have given in Articles for deletion/Family tree of Ali and Articles for deletion/Family tree of Uthman ibn Affan. None of these individuals was a separate dynasty on their own but all were part of the first Muslim Dynasty centred on Muhammad and the first four Caliphs. Otherwise we will be here till Kingdom come, with family tree for every single person who was related to Muhammad or happened to live across the street from him. Green Giant 01:15, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Move per Green Giant. A much better way for a reader to understand a genealogical tree than individual nodes for each person or random persons in the tree. Weregerbil 08:22, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Move per Green Giant. --phh 01:50, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Aisha. savidan(talk) (e@) 01:07, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.