Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family tree of Umar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 07:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Family tree of Umar

 * Delete and merge any relevant material into the Umar page per WP:NOT number 6 Genealogical entries, also this material could easily fit into the Umar article if it was condenced minus the spacing and irrelevant "no this is not a mistake.." type commentary. I had put a merge tag on this article in mid-March but in early April the creator of the article removed the merge tag. Jersey Devil 19:38, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge relevent data to Umar. My first thought was that this information would work better as an image/graphic. However, the content seems non-notable per WP:NOT. I feel whatever important information that can be salvaged needs to be in the main page.--Andrew c 22:07, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Uh oh, he's at it again. This is part of Jersey Devil's long-standing crusade against Striver. See similar articles and AfD nominations: Family tree of Ali with Articles for deletion/Family tree of Ali and Family tree of Uthman ibn Affan with Articles for deletion/Family tree of Uthman ibn Affan. To Muslims this is highly notable. See also this phrase: "While 'Wikipedia is not a genealogy database', genealogy of nobility and royalty is considered encyclopedic", from Deletion policy/Maltese nobility (which does not have policy status but may be considered a consensus-based guideline). To Muslims, the caliphs have a status comparable to royalty. Lambiam Talk 22:32, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Recommend User:Striver see WikiTree for geneaology article. Regrettably, it can't be transwikid as WikiTree uses CC license. Stifle (talk) 00:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --MaNeMeBasat 13:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.