Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous Birthdays


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Famous Birthdays

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not enough sources to support notability. Most refs are promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:c600:3379:c46c:cc1f:b9c7:9b5a:8453 (talk) 07:48, May 4, 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor--above text is copied from the talk page of this discussion page. I have no opinion of my own at this time.  --Finngall talk  16:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:11, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: I put the more citations needed template as it needs more sources. CastJared (talk) 00:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Near enough in article and a quick search in newspapers.com, google books and proquest finds more suitable sources. Skynxnex (talk) 02:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. More citations could be easily added, but the website is very popular and notable. Lewcm (talk) 17:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.