Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous entities with chess related names

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 19:14, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

Famous entities with chess related names

 * Delete. I don't understand the point of the article.--Sonjaaa 19:29, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as, um, chesscruft. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  04:31, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. And congratulations to the user for creating a new form of cruft. Khanartist  09:06, 2005 Jan 17 (UTC)
 * Delete. Its not even factually accurate - "Exchequer" does not mean "chess board" it is derived from The Norman French? for "checked cloth". Chess board quite possibly has the same origins, but just because A and B are both derrived from C does not mean that A is derrived from B. Thryduulf 11:15, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually, if you read Exchequer, you'll find that yes, it derives its name from a chess board. Uncle G 15:35, 2005 Jan 17 (UTC)
 * My appologies, I was basing my comment on what I heard at Dover Castle last summer. Thryduulf 16:34, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * The individual articles already had far more detailed etymologies. And a list of "chess-related" hyperlinks belongs in the "See Also" section of chess. Delete. 15:35, 2005 Jan 17 (UTC)
 * Delete. All those silly "Rukh"/"rook" puns are BJAODN fare... unless "rukh" actually does mean "rook" in some other language. --Idont Havaname 06:38, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.