Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fan World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salting can be asked for at WP:RFPP Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Fan World

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable fan event, search shows little to no coverage from reliable third party sources. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON as the first con was only held a few months ago. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  11:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Deleted under G11 but recreated 10 minutes later. Proposed for deletion, but WP:CONTESTED by creator. On nom's talk page they indicate they are writing on behalf of an unspecified entity. Searching for "Fan World" Niagara I find nothing that suggests this new event inaugurated in 2016 would meet WP:NEVENT even if anyone without a COI would be willing to rewrite this G11 candidate. Delete per WP:DEL8 at least. — Sam Sailor 14:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 14:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 14:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. SephyTheThird (talk) 20:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't appear to be notable and in many ways appears suspicious. Strikes me as an "adverticle". SephyTheThird (talk) 21:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NEVENT to meet notability. Here's a review of the 2016 event. Notice Niagara Falls Comic Con, which had local news coverage , doesn't even have an article yet. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - It does appear to have had some (minor?) coverage in a number of sources online but the article at its current state is far too promotional. At best, this could be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt - Delete per WP:N, and salt due to the fact that this article was recreated 10 minutes after it was last deleted. This may seem heavy handed but if/when the article becomes notable it can always be undone. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.