Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fandral Staghelm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. This is a Secret account 01:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Fandral Staghelm

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

'''Please note that I do not nominate these articles together due to a previous trainwreck. It would be appreciated that you do NOT merge these Articles for deletions together, as the previous decision was to decide on the values of each article separately.'''

As there is a huge majority of articles that need to go through an AfD (literally over 100), the reasons listed may not be as relevant to this article as it would be another. Either way, they all appear to have the same problems and still must be noted to make a decision.

This character article appears to comprised of unsourced, unnotable, fancruft.

This article has little to no third-party sources, with usually the only source being on another wiki, a gaming site, or the Blizzard website.

This article is also not notable to non-Warcraft players, as chances are, a complete stranger to the series would not read this article at all, failing real-world notability.

Finally, this article is most likely fancruft, possibly created through original research. These are mostly unwelcome, continuing on the basis that non-players would have no interest in it.

This article is nominated individually to prevent another trainwreck from occurring while also allowing editors to individually decide which article should stay and which should go. The above reasons are as to why each of these articles should be deleted, whether they are completely relevant or hardly relevant. IAmSasori 00:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as it fails WP:PLOT and also WP:FICT. There is no reason for all of these characters to have Articles since they cannot inherit their game's notability. Bobby1011 02:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions.   —Quasirandom 04:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as this stub has no real-world content, context, primary or secondary sources, just plot summary. --Gavin Collins 09:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Doctorfluffy 17:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.