Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fangs (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 02:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Fangs (album)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An album which is not even released yet, and when it is will probably be indistinguishable from a hundred thousand others. Guy (Help!) 22:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

It has been announced and is an official CD, so I don't really see why it shouldn't stay where it is. What do you mean by "indistinguishable"? That's sort of a personal opinion, don't you think? Chris —Preceding undated comment was added at 22:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  22:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * keep seems fine as a future scheduled release. --neon white talk 23:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep--future release, but with documentation, so no violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Drmies (talk) 05:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The article has a little more than just a release date and track listing, but not much. The worst thing about the article is that the references are all WP:SELFPUBlished. Since the band is notable, I'm assuming this can be cleaned up with better sources. - Mgm|(talk) 10:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Are we allowed to use Myspace profiles as references? I'm never sure about that, but a lot of relevant information in the Wiki entry comes from there. Also, I'm not sure what other sources I can use, since the BEC site is the only other source, and is the most reputable at the moment. Chrisdazzo (talk) 00:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: no myspace can't be used for verification as it is not independent from the subject. JamesBurns (talk) 03:49, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.