Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fanlala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Fanlala

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

created for high degree of promotions, nothing else! nothing is here Light2021 (talk) 20:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete per nom - I'm finding a tiny amount of passing mention coverage of Fanlala and its parent and previous name, IMbee, an FTC press release that didn't appear to get coverage and an RSes about the owner's past. But nothing that swings it for me - David Gerard (talk) 10:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and I wish I had in fact commented sooner so we could've deleted it faster, given this is a clear advertisement, only listing the information best suited for advertising the company itself, and it's a fact considering this has literally not changed since said started advertisement therefore suggesting no one apparently cares at all for making an actual convincing article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:49, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources are pretty weak. The coverage in reliable sources is limited to brief mentions with no depth such as, and . I don't see enough to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH at this time. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.