Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fann Cup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 14 days with only one "good faith" argument for deletion. All the other !votes are from blocked socks. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Fann Cup

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Very poorly written, the website that the creator told me to look at didn't seem to be a good enough reference. Seems like some minor charity event. UnknownThing (talk) 19:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Per this revision, the article may be going under construction but there are still no references and it still seems unnotable to me. Plus the image is not of the "cup" but rather a non-free image of lacrosse. I think this supports the debate for delete some more. UnknownThing (talk) 20:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Note: The creator of Fann Cup, Specialkjamie has been blocked indefinitely. UnknownThing (talk) 20:55, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Being a competition for the fans of notable teams doesn't make the competition notable. Majority of ghits (first five pages, anyway) appear to be unreliable sources. Peridon (talk) 23:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Despite the note below, I stand by my !vote. Peridon (talk) 21:11, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Nominator of this AFD has been ✅ by CheckUser as a sock of banned user and has been blocked indefinitely. –MuZemike 20:49, 6 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, only one reference that is unreliable as well as the creator being blocked from Wikipedia. 1313-EvilHomer (talk) 08:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Unless I'm reading things wrongly, the creator and the nominator are both blocked - being one and the same person. Interesting..... Peridon (talk) 21:13, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.