Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantastic Man (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is a clear consensus that this magazine is notable, because there are reliable sources that are independent of the subject that have noted it. Therefore while the article may need editing, it is not necessary to delete it. NAC by— S Marshall  Talk / Cont  12:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)'''

Fantastic Man (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Semi-spam for non-notable small-circulation magazine Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  02:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite 01:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The sources provided in the article include substantial articles in The New York Times and The Times about this magazine. How does that not meet our notability guidelines? Phil Bridger (talk) 22:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The topic is clearly notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 00:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. The magazine is notable. Jack Schlederer  Talk   Adds  03:33, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.