Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantastic Services


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:58, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Fantastic Services

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article by spa on non-notable business. It might be possible to have an article on either this business or its ceo -- see the adjacent afd-- but having both of them is confusing us with a public relations outlet.  DGG ( talk ) 04:45, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Which article would be more encyclopedic -- the company or its CEO? Potatornado (talk) 13:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 05:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 05:03, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 05:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep and Merge Rune Sovndahl to this one. Mention of this company in some good sources. - Mar11 (talk) 15:35, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:36, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete- promotion article that fails WP:CORP--Rusf10 (talk) 19:47, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- corporate spam and a promotional walled garden that also includes the founder. Delete both. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete- Promotional, consider WP:PRODUCT. Scriblerian1 (talk) 07:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and Merge CEO's article into this - Neither article is supported enough on its own, but between the two, there seem to be notable sources. Potatornado (talk) 16:39, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Pure spam, fails WP:SPIP, references fail the criteria for establishing notability and are not intellectually independent, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing ++ 21:48, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.