Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantasywear

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 21:42, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)

Fantasywear
Another idiosyncratic dictionary definition from Supercool Dude. Uncle G 03:48, 2005 Jan 16 (UTC)

Keep. This seems like a reasonable stub and the author gives some very concrete examples. The nomination is factually inaccurate; just about anybody who uses fantasywear would recognise this as a reasonable definition. I agree with Plek about the move, but this can be done by the editors if and when they want to. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:48, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of people are into fetish/fantasy stuff. Might evolve into something useful. I'd say rename it to "Fantasy wear", though. Google gives about 5.000 hits for the former and 60.000 hits for the latter term. --Plek 17:10, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, in need of cleanup and expansion. Megan1967 01:59, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.