Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Far Forest Scrolls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow close. This isn't a hoax per se since this is about a fictional world, but the lack of any coverage for this as of yet unreleased series shows a clear lack of notability. There is a valid concern over this being a promotional article as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Far Forest Scrolls

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Non notable fictional universe. Some references are spurious. Note that the disclaimer notifying the reader that this is all tosh was at the bottom of the article: I moved it to the top, since there was no mention of the fact that this is all a figment of a somebody's imagination. TheLongTone (talk) 23:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - fails all inclusion criteria miserably. Potentially appropriate for db-hoax or the speedy deletion criteria currently being considered relating to people using WP as a webhost. Stalwart 111  00:47, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This one is off the charts in failing... well everything. Concur with Stalwart111 that this comes very close to WP:HOAX material. -Ad Orientem (talk) 06:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as an elaborate hoax. At best, fiction with no real world notability. The citations are bogus. Most of the external links for the cited authorities are at free hosting websites. The Far Forest Scrolls website suggests this is an unpublished project. Not enough to satisfy WP:V. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.