Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faradarmani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Mr.Z-man 04:37, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Faradarmani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of WP:notability. Unsourced. Google searches not finding significant coverage in independent sources. Dispute prod. noq (talk) 15:52, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:59, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment-- Even if it is found to be notable with sources, with so small a stub I would think it would be best to merge it somewhere anyway... Lesion  ( talk ) 20:13, 20 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect (for now) to Mohammad Ali Taheri, founder of this pseudo-scientific therapy, even if I see some notability concerns about the same Taheri. Cavarrone 07:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - There are no other third-party ressources on Faradarmani, and since Faradarmani simultanously is a source of income for Mohammad Ali Taheri it should be considered as an advertisement instead of an article. In my opinion the same notability issue also extends itself to the leader of this pseudo-scientific therapy. There are almost no existing third-party references regarding Mohammad Ali Taheri, and his followers (whose usernames are derived from Faradarmani terms) keep deleting posts from other users under the pretext that they are "unofficial" users, and subsquently replace with material from the homepage of Taheri. Consequently I would prefer this discussion of notability to be extended in order to include Mohammad Ali Taheri — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepamois (talk • contribs) 11:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I completely agree with the reasoning of Sepamois. This article is basically two lines of unsourced spam. We should delete it and then separately take a look at the article on Taheri. --MelanieN (talk) 22:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.