Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faraquet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Faraquet

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

One EP on a possibly notable label, plus an LP on another possibly notable lael. Nothing significant in News, no other reliable sources found. Only sources are unreliable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  17:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:26, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: could not find anything of verifiable significance, as per WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 04:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I've just completed the article with reliable references. A Washington Post editorial review and an Allmusic entry with review is enough to pass WP:BAND C#1. Please, always google bandname+review and bandname+interview before claiming there are no reliable sources available, otherwise you'll end up deleting articles on clearly notable bands. I hope this one's saved now. Strummer25 (talk) 23:01, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, passes WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 03:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, important band cageybee  (toccyx)  15:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep – In addition to what's already noted, I found a review in The Washington Post of their album The View From This Tower: Jenkins, Mark (2001-01-05). "The hardcore-punk style patented two decades ago", The Washington Post, p. T14. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 23:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.