Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faraz Rabbani

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 00:48, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

Faraz Rabbani
How is encyclopedic notability being illustrated in this article? If it isn't, should it be shunted over to List of bloggers or List of translators? Please discuss. --GRider\talk 22:07, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This is getting out of hand. Please see Requests_for_comment/GRider2.


 * I don't know. Should it?  You tell me. Chris 22:17, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Perhaps. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:28, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * No vote. Lacrimosus 01:57, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * And what sort of difference creates enmity and anger? Suppose for example that you and I, my good friend, differ about a number; do differences of this sort make us enemies and set us at variance with one another?  Do we not go at once to arithmetic, and put an end to them by a sum? Faethon387 02:29, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Outlook good. Magic 8-Ball 14:08, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep; nomination is malformed. &#8212;Markaci 2005-03-22 T 03:05 Z
 * Delete, under the bar of notability, reads like a promo. Megan1967 05:11, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Valid article. Invalid nominator. Wincoote 13:11, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Looks like a keep to me even with the promotional overtones. - Lucky 6.9 05:32, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * No vote Malicious nomination. --Lee Hunter 03:55, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.