Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farewell (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. They are not quite notable under WP:MUSIC yet, however, when they become more notable, the article should be recreated. The one thing I see is that according to the article, they've only released one EP and one LP, neither of which has charted or been covered in major press. Kei lana  04:08, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Farewell (band)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod, so here we are. Simply releasing one single album does not meet WP:MUSIC, without charts, awards, etc. to indicate notability. Ravenna1961 (talk) 02:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  jj137  ♠  Talk 03:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC. J- ſtan TalkContribs 04:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   --  Double Blue  (Talk) 05:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Actually, passes WP:MUSIC by (a) having released more than one record (two EPS, one album); (b) having the aforementioned album released by Epitaph Records, the largest true independent in the world, which they joined at the personal request of the founder; and (c) having completed multiple national tours, one of which they are on as we speak. More research, please, people.  tomasz.  11:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. Just below the edge of WP:MUSIC. Fails criterion 5. Only one work out on a large independent lable. Fails criterion 4. An eastcoast tour is not a national tour. The fact that Brett Gurewitz scouted them does not make them notable. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * no, an east coast tour is not a national tour, but their other national tours were indeed national tours. "being scouted by B.G." is admittedly not a WP:MUSIC criterion but i rather think it is notable.  tomasz.  16:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you link the source for the national tour for those as source impaired as me? That would be a vote swayer for me. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable enough for an article under WP:Music yet. May become so at a future date. At present there are insufficient non-trivial secondary sources and the music output is not sufficient. Brett Gurewitz scouting them is irrelevent because notablity is not transferable. A1octopus (talk) 18:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Peter Fleet (talk) 09:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The cited sources are not Rolling Stone or The New York Times, but there are at least two independent articles, from Alternative Press (which I have now added) and from Teen. The release on Epitaph and their tour, neither on its own would pass WP:MUSIC—but taken as a whole, I think there is enough here for a keep.-- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 06:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Paul Erik above&mdash; arf! 04:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep- I think this is a well-done, informative article completely within the standards of Wikipedia.--JP (talk) 22:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.