Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farid Benramdane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  06:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Farid Benramdane

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Very few importance appearances in top leagues and article generally fails WP:GNG. Player is currently playing in the sixth tier of French football as well. Paul Vaurie (talk) 04:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 04:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete since NFOOTY no longer exists, it does not meet GNG and should be deleted.Samanthany (talk) 01:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - First, this article should be kept since it was created before WP:NFOOTY 'stopped existing', and its not like he made 1-3 appearances (he made 10 appearances for a fully pro team - see his Soccerway profile). Secondly, he has at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 reliable source articles mainly about him. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 01:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Those sources provided above do not appear to be RS SIGCOV. There's an interview and several WP:ROUTINE notices of transfers. Also Wikipedia notability policies do not have a grandfather clause, stuff created back when the rules were different are not immune from having the rules applied to them now. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack af WP:SIGCOV. and  are interviews with no significant input from the author so it is not independent of the subject., , ,  and  are a minor transfer stories or trivial mentions and not SIGCOV. Note that there no grandfather clause on the now depricated WP:NFOOTY and it was depricated as it was an extremely poor indicator of whether footballers had the significant coverage to pass GNG. Alvaldi (talk) 09:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. Sourcing provided above is routine. GiantSnowman 13:16, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agreed that routine match reports and Q&A interviews do not count towards GNG. Why do editors still bring up these kinds of sources when they clearly do not meet our guidelines and regularly fail at AfD? JoelleJay (talk) 00:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.