Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farid Hajiyev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Farid Hajiyev

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

BLP. Fails GNG and NBIO. Individual is an administrator and second degree state advisor, not an elected official. Sources in article do not have WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE found routine mill news and name mentions, nothing that indicates this subject meets GNG or NBIO.  // Timothy :: talk  06:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)


 * ? Johsgun Aliyev (talk) 10:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Johsgun Aliyev (talk) When you open a discussion, are you looking for the person in the article?

The person is the chief of staff of the National Assembly of the Republic of Azerbaijan and is the only person in this position in Azerbaijan. He is also a second-tier state legislator, a position held by only 10 people. 10:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Azerbaijan.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  12:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information and the person himself is completely encyclopedic. Johsgun Aliyev (talk) 12:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Farid Hajiyev is Chief of Staff (Azerbaijan National Assembly). 1. And Mr Hajiyev is State Counsellor, 2nd rank. 2 Atakhanli (talk) 21:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Further input required from uninvolved editors. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak delete – Subjects fairly passes WP:NPOL criterion 1, however, there are almost no reliable in depth sources. Toad ette  ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 07:31, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The official website of the Milli Majlis (Azerbaijan National Assembly) is not reliable? Atakhanli (talk) 22:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  06:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. As best I can tell, the subject is not a member of parliament or an elected official of some sort, but rather a staff member of Azerbaijan's parliament or a run of the mill bureaucrat appointed by the authoritarian regime in Azerbaijan. Thenightaway (talk) 12:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I have analyzed your contributions and repeatedly felt that you have a serious grudge against Azerbaijan and Azerbaijani authorities. You violate the neutrality of Wikipedia and promote your own political interests. You have nominated mass of articles about Azerbaijan and Azerbaijanis for deletion and in almost every coment you have described the Azerbaijani government as a run of the mill bureaucracy and an authoritarian regime. Most of your arguments are baseless. Surə   🗯  13:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * We need to inform Wikipedia members about you, because how many times you try to delete public figures of Azerbaijan using the deletion template, probably mature people will investigate what is behind this. Johsgun Aliyev (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * He is a person who is important for the state and has a role in foreign policy. I think you should improve your language knowledge and read Azerbaijani, then you will see that he is a completely enscaledic person. Johsgun Aliyev (talk) 18:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep Pass WP:GNG/SIGCOV, I think the problem with these articles is the reliable sources not being in English. There are numerous secondary sources in Azerbaijani addressing the subject directly and indepth. Also, subject fairly passes WP:NPOL and the facts are verifiable: The official website of the Milli Majlis and the Decree of the President of Azerbaijan (official copy of the decree's text) ARE  the most reliable sources to proof the facts and also there are reliable secondary sources. -- Surə   🗯  18:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Final relist. Those arguing to keep have to be specific about sources, give a link to a webpage or name a book or journal with page number. It can't just be "sources exist", you have to bring them into the discussion so others can read and evaluate them, too. And notability is not established by the opinions of editors but by reliable sources. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. He does not pass WP:NPOL because he is not a member of the legislative body, but a chief of staff. He also does not pass WP:GNG because all or most sources on the page are from his place of work. They may be reliable, but we need multiple independent 3rd party RS to pass WP:GNG. My very best wishes (talk) 03:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * All news and main sources added. Johsgun Aliyev (talk) 23:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * All news and main sources added. Johsgun Aliyev (talk) 23:37, 9 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete he’s a public servant but NPOL does not apply to him as he is not a politician. We therefore need the same sources as we require for an other BLP - sustained in depth coverage from reliable independent sources. Official announcements of appointments won’t do. Mccapra (talk) 19:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * All news and main sources added. Johsgun Aliyev (talk) 23:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete there's no part of WP:NPOL, nor has there been any consensus at AfD, that high ranking bureaucrats satisfy the criteria for presumed notability. Sourcing in the article is entirely government press releases which lack independence for purposes of establishing notability; there is no evidence of compliant reliable sourcing to satisfy WP:BIO/WP:GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.