Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FarmVille


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. speedy keep (non-admin closure) Odie5533 (talk) 07:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

FarmVille

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EvilOne93 (talk • contribs)

Fixed incomplete nomination. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 20:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

''Note: This nomination is one of several games by Zynga nominated for AfD: Words With Friends, Treasure Isle, The Pioneer Trail, Friends for Sale, Empires & Allies, Drugwars, CityVille, YoVille, Texas HoldEm Poker. See also relevant WT:VG section.'' — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 21:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Snow keep. The article already has reliable, secondary, non-trivial sources. Notability and WP:GNG satisfied. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 21:21, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep: I call bull shit. SL93 (talk) 21:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep This appears to be one of a group of disruptive nominations. Perhaps an administrator might evaluate if this and other similar nominations qualify for a speedy close?  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  00:25, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Is this nomination a joke? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Wretched excuse for a "game", but undeniably notable. Hugely popular and has accordingly seen plenty of mainstream press attention.  No lack of sources.  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  02:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep for all the above reasons. I would non-admin close these debates, but I consider myself involved in these articles.  RJaguar3 &#124;  u  &#124;  t  04:46, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I echo the opinion of  St ar bli nd  to the letter. ῤerspeκὖlὖm   in ænigmate  (talk) (spy)  04:50, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep the article is properly sourced, and the subject is obviously notable. I fail to see a good argument in favor of deleting among the last seven so let's just close this... MuSiClOvEr (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.