Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farm Animal Reform Movement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Farm Animal Reform Movement

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable campaigning organisation. The creator appears to be a member of it, so at creation it was an advert; after clean-up it was changed back to an advert and after clean-up again it became an advert again. I've tried to talk to the creator but she's unresponsive, sadly, as she'd be the only person who could point out any notability or sources (other than the organisation itself) for the organisation. Rather than continue this strange low-level edit war where she writes an advert, I stub it down and ask for notability, she writes another advert, I stub it down and so on, I think this should go.  REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ 08:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. It's an advert and it appears to be the work of a single purpose account. If it isn't salted it will most likely continue to reappear. BTLizard 09:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom - having plowed through the edit history & revisions, it's clear this is going to keep being recreated. Although I'll mourn the loss to Wikipedia of the sentence "we lift the scales to glimpse the horrors on your plates". -  irides centi   (talk to me!)  10:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as POV and spam. I will preserve the quote on my userpage. Yet another reason to not support United Way. --killing sparrows 12:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Note that article has been reverted back to an advert, without comment, yet again. I'm not bothering to re-revert again, although I've tried again to contact the author... this time with a warning template, sadly.  REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ  17:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * weak keep I understand the problem, and I suppose the way to go is to eventually ban her from the article. DGG 02:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.