Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farrah Sarafa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:51, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Farrah Sarafa

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Biography of a living person with negligible references; one footnote is to a 2006 article in Finnish that mentions the subject in only two paragraphs, and the other footnote is a broken link to an unreliable source. None of her awards are referenced, which makes notability = 0. I googled and found no indication of notability. This bio was the subject of a complaint at BLPN, which is how I got involved. I proposed it for deletion, and it was undeleted here by an admin who suggested using AfD instead.Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep as a quick search found one source to support part of the article and suggested that a more extensive search could support the rest. There is not much in the article and cetainly nothing controversial. Weakopedia (talk) 18:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely non-notable.  Notability neither asserted nor demonstrated.  Fails WP:BK, WP:AUTHOR, and WP:BIO. Qworty (talk) 07:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually that's a complete load of rubbish, and throwing out some wiki-acronyms is no substitute for substance in debate. Weakopedia (talk) 07:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Qworty said that before Robman added a bunch of sources, and even after Robman did so he said his "keep" was "weak". So I don't see any need to blast Qworty.Anythingyouwant (talk) 15:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Keep I just searched and found a bunch of references, which I have added to the article.  It's debatable whether she's notable enough for Wikipedia, but she's more than "not notable". Robman94 (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.