Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farshad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Per the arguments given, there is consensus to delete: the article remains unsourced. &mdash;Sean Whitton / 12:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Farshad

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete unsourced article about a given name with no indication why it's notable. WP is not a baby-naming guide. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete Baby names are so the new X Brazilian. On a serious note, I don't think we want to have wikipedia articles for all names, and I can find no reason to believe this name is particularly notable. It's unsourced, one line, and I can't really imagine an encyclopedic expansion. Vickser (talk) 00:11, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Anthroponymy has been informed of this ongoing discussion. Beef Dripping (talk) 13:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep pending reference addition - I have tagged with unreferenced. Absence of citations without due diligence to provide them (either by effort or notification) is not itself grounds for deletion.  After a reasonable period, if supporting material is not provided, bring back to AfD for re-review. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 10:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Protonk (talk) 04:40, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.