Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fart fetish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  18:41, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Fart fetish

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced, does not assert notability or cite reliable sources, and appears to be original research. An article about the same thing was deleted in 2006 (Articles for deletion/Fart fetishism (2)) however there was a previous AFD with "keep" result. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 22:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources under this title nor under the more "medical" name of Eproctophilia (which I learned from Encyclopedia Dramatica). Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete until reliable sources can be found, either under this name, or "Eproctophilia". -- Mizu onna sango15 / 水 女 珊瑚15  22:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:22, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Without any meaningful research content, I think it can go. —MarionTheLibrarian (talk) 00:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete let this one blow in the wind. JuJube (talk) 00:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Shaking the Delete aerosol Without proper referencing, it would appear to fail WP:N. --Ecoleetage (talk) 07:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless and until there is some sourced content to go in it. --Simon Speed (talk) 22:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Without any sources, it's quite silent but deadly. Squidfryerchef (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:RS.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 20:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * not delete 201.8.37.205 (talk) 23:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 201.8.37.205 (talk) 23:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC) A simple research on the web searching machines reveals to us a large quantity of webpages on the theme. Even being not so canonical, fart fetishism really appears to exist, so it deserves its own article, closely linked to BDSM practices.
 * 201.8.37.205 (talk) 23:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 201.8.37.205 (talk) 23:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC) I have resource material on this subject, doubt-free sexual studies research, but I am a novice on Wikipedia, totally geek, how can I can post my research reference here???
 * You can not publish original research here. Bearian (talk) 23:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.