Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fashion (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep, nomination withdrawn with consensus to keep. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fashion (film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Explicitly fails future film notability guidelines. No prejudice towards re-creation if it goes into production. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * KEEP: The film has started filming and doesn't fail any of the rules. Universal Hero (talk) 10:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. A quick search of Google News provided ample sources, and it's clear that filming has already begun . A little bit of research by the nominator wouldn't have gone amiss, though the article could certainly do with a little more content. PC78 (talk) 10:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Although to be fair, the article did state that the film was in pre-production prior to the AfD. PC78 (talk) 10:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, as sourcing has been provided. I know Universal Hero is a diligent editor of articles on upcoming Indian films, and hope that he will remember to provide sources so as to avoid AfDs like this again. :) Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 12:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure Girolamo, I'll make sure I will. Universal Hero (talk) 14:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.