Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fashiontime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Fashiontime

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This topic about a Hungarian fashion magazine appears to fail WP:N. Additional opinion about the notability of media on Wikipedia can be read at the essay Notability (media). Several searches, including ones in GNews archives and GBooks, are not providing coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any sources. Even a search on hungarian Google doesn't give anything of substance. Ryan Vesey 22:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. --LlamaAl (talk) 02:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Per NMEDIA #5 it says a "significant publication in [a].. non-trivial niche market". Fashion is a non-trivial niche market. So the question is if this considered a "significant" Hungarian fashion magazine? We need some sort of evidence of significance. Unfortunately I am unable to find anything, magazines are notoriously difficult to establish notability (unlike books and films), being a niche market in Hungary even more difficult. Gut feeling at only 4 years old its significance has yet to be established, but who knows maybe it's significant in some way we are not aware, thus still worth further research if anyone cares to. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 21:33, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.