Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fasihi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Jclemens (talk) 03:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Fasihi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a non-notable company. Article was apparently mainly written by the company itself. The article topic is also unclear, beside talking about the company it also lists a infobox for a software product which has apparently the same name. Also the article is categorized as german ISP which is wrong. Kju (talk) 23:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:21, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Various red flags here. De.wikipedia doesn't have them, which is always a bad sign for a German company.  A lot of the "references" don't mention Fasihi at all.  (The first one does, but not on the page actually cited.  Google translate renders the mention into English horrible Yoda-speak here, if you want to read it.  Or you can take it on faith that I've read all the sources, and, they're press releases.) I don't see any redeeming factors, so I'm going to go with delete.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  00:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.