Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast Company magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy keep, thanks to Andrew. Just zis Guy you know? 21:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Fast Company magazine
Stub article on a magazine whose media pack gives no clue as to circulation. It says how many subscribers the web forum has, but not how many people read the magazine. If the claim that Fucked Company took its name as a parody of this can e verified that might just ab out constitute a claim to notability, otherwise I can't see any claim here. Just zis Guy you know? 17:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Major, well-known magazine. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:20, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * And as for circulation, according to [this article], it hit a peak of 750,000 as of 2002. Though it's probably less now, I think it's safe to say that's enough.  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per reasons from Articles for deletion/Inc. Magazine. AnonEMouse 17:48, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.