Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast bowlers

Fast bowlers was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to keep. Cool Hand Luke  19:55, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Dicdef. No notable content. - Ta bu shi da yu 11:23, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Keep and expand into an article. Certainly this ought to be a useful article pertinent to cricket. Sjc 11:30, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Certainly has potential to become a real article. Shane King 12:22, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
 * I'll go with keep on this one. Needs some cricket fans' attention, but it appears to be a commonly-used term: Google gives over 80,000 hits, and they relate to the term, as far as I can tell. --Slowking Man 06:08, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, totally common cricket term, and relates to a very important evolution in the history of the sport. Should end up with a good article once someone knowledgable takes it on. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:38, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * We should look at having something on this topic - however, should it be fast bowlers or fast bowling - ie. technique. Keep for the moment. Capitalistroadster 06:48, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Has potential. Keep and expand. Average Earthman 09:07, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Have redirected to extant fast bowling, which is better than this. Which is what the original lister should've done.   You are aware that there are alternatives to VfD'ing everything, right?  Sheesh-- GWO 09:45, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * It was listed as a candidate for speedy deletion. I moved it to VfD. Sheesh yourself. - Ta bu shi da yu 14:57, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * You mean there's more than one person running round trying to get stuff deleted without doing any research first? I feel better already.  Sheesh.  -- GWO 09:04, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep current redirect. Nice catches Ta bu shi da yu, GWO  &mdash; siro  &chi;  o  14:07, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.