Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fastvision


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Fastvision

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability apart from a nomination for a minor award. The 'sources' in the article are homepages for an assortment of companies. It's bordering on being a speedy deletion candidate for advertising! Sionk (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: The references verify the article text but I am finding no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 10:08, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.