Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fastweb.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Yuser31415 02:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Fastweb.com

 * -- (View AfD)

The article Fastweb.com is quite POV and reads like an ad. Either it needs to be deleted, or an unbiased editor should completely rewrite it. V-Man737 09:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - seems notable enough to pass WP:WEB (I found multiple hits through Google News) but a re-write might be necessary. Doesn't need to be deleted though. Jayden54 17:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and source properly, per Jayden54. Additional comments: (a) The two existing sources in the article are directly linked with the subject, and (b) The reason given by the nominator for deletion is not a reason for deletion - tagging with Template:Advert may have been a better option. CiaranG 17:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep, source, and expand. If it's notable, & it seems to be if only as history, there ought to be more to sayDGG 01:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.