Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fat Boy Red Omega


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost  Singu  larity  03:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Fat Boy Red Omega

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Even less notable than anything else on Wikipedia. This is supposedly a band, but they've never released anything; there are no sources whatsoever. Fails WP:V and WP:N. However, the article is so nuts that I'd like to nominate it for BJAODN, so please don't edit anything out. :-) AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 19:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * delete - also, it's created by yet another (registered) SPA. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 19:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not-notable. This vote brought to you by the Society to Eradicate Single-Purpose Account Spam, a/k/a SESPAS. (I just invented that. I wonder if it's notable enough for an article yet?) Realkyhick 21:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Why don't you start an article on it? Oh wait.... AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 22:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete I'd say speedy except for the reasonable desire to incoporate it into BJAODN first.  This is what is meant by no credible claim to notability. DGG (talk) 00:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * it's in BJAODN now, or part of it is, so now nothing holds us back. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per all of the above. 4 hits on MSN and 9 Ghits, all of which are WP or mirrors. Must rate as the least notable band ever, or a hoax. Bearian 19:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.