Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fat Chance (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This has been open much longer that it should have been, and nobody other than the nominator feels it's not notable. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 03:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Fat Chance (novel)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

unsure about this book's notability.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 01:22, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - The author appears to be notable, and the young adult market is not well documented online, so it is difficult to demonstrate notability of a book published 10+ years ago. Ideally, we would have an article about the author and merge this in there. More recent interviews with the author and reviews of subsequent books often mention this book, so it is likely to be notable at least within Australia. Perhaps someone familiar with Australian book publishing could help out here. Risker (talk) 04:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 06:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - author's other books have been made into Australian TV series Pugwall, hence fulfils notability criteria. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.