Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Fatali

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

not notable, per WP:MUSIC or WP:BIO - should be deleted and redirected to Fatali Khan Khoyski, Azerbaijani prime minister. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:42, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've never even heard of Fatali Khan Khoyski, but I've sure heard of Fatali! More antipsytrance on Wikipedia. We lost Texas Faggott last week, let's not lose another important psytrance band shall we? They don't chart; psytrance doesn't chart. But find me a psytrance fan, anywhere in the world, who has not heard of these bands or seen them countless times. Now perhaps people will agree that there is an attempt, for god knows what reason, to eradicate psytrance from Wikipedia. Enough is enough. 29,800 pages on Google list BOTH "Fatali" AND "trance". Can we stop this nonsense, now? I live in London and Fatali was one of the reasons I went to Turkey 2 years ago, to see the live set. One of the highlights. So please, stop this antipsytrance rubbish. Tris2000 (talk) 12:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. First of all, there is no conspiracy, even though you claimed that in the Texas Faggott AfD process. At least, I'm not in it; I still don't know what psytrance is (although if it is what I think it is, I probably like it). Charts, that's one of many ways of establishing notability--don't go claim some anti-commercial stance here for this genre; I'm sure Fatali gets paid for his many venues and festivals. I looked at some sixty or seventy Google-hits, and none of them, not a single one, is what might be called independent, objective, in-depth. Sure, Google proves he exists, but that's not the point. Not notable. Drmies (talk) 03:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Delete- Article doesn't provide verifiable sources to establish notability. --Jmundo (talk) 16:26, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: As is, the article fails WP:BAND and is deletable IMO. But, if enough references actually exist, I don't see this as beyond saving. If references could be found to establish notability, this article would just need NPOV work. But, if the references don't exist to give this topic some ground, I'd say delete. By the way, when an editor puts similarly worded !votes on multiple AfD's, it tends to reduce their impact. Just a tip. Robert Skyhawk So sue me! (You'll lose)
 * Delete - At this particular point in time, the artist fails WP:MUSIC. &mdash; neuro(talk) 08:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: article fails to establish notability of this artist, as per WP:MUSIC. JamesBurns (talk) 03:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.