Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatbike


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 04:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Fatbike

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Bicycle brand. I don't think one mention in the Anchorage newspaper is enough to establish encyclopedic notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - ^ that and the article only has one sentence -- Cra del  19:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- Gavin Collins (talk) 11:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as there is no content, context or reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notbability. --Gavin Collins (talk) 11:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Google, people.  I added a citation to Fox News.  Presumably that's a reliable source.  Incidentally, nothing wrong with a newspaper simply because it's in Alaska, and nothing wrong with a one-sentence stub.  I rewrote it to be clearer, but the sentence did what a lead is supposed to do, identified the subject and said what it's all about.  Short articles are there to be expanded, not deleted.  Wikidemo (talk) 14:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment If the only sources you have cited support the statement "The bicycles are designed for use on snow" then that is a trivial reference that fails WP:CORP, no matter where it comes from. I have no idea why an experienced editor such as yourself would have created this stub. It has so little content that it would not even be included as a footnote in an article on bicycles. From where I stand, you are just timewasting. --Gavin Collins (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. It actually helps if you read the sources from time to time.  I couldn't seem to access the Anchorage news article on the link provided, but here's another link that replicates that news story.   Clearly more than just a sentence that says "they're designed to be used on snow" as they talk about the competition that Wildfire faces in making/marketing these things.  I'd agree with Wikidemo, seems to be enough notability to keep and expand.  --Craw-daddy | T | 22:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.