Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fate X


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wizardman 05:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Fate X

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable AOL hacking software. External links are very questionable. No evidence that this software package was ever discussed in mainstream sources. Thus, the article fails verifiability standards. *** Crotalus *** 16:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 
 * Delete per nominator's rationale.  A l i c e  ✉ 07:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I thought the two of us had reached a unanimous consensus (are you forgetting the "silent majority" - huge grin?)  A l i c e  ✉ 22:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, same as the first time. -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  00:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nomination as well. -- Midorihana (talk) (contribs)  03:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator's rationale again.  A l i c e  ✉ 04:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

This is an absolute shame. These so called "proggies" were a large part of the turbulent upbringing of our modern day "technology era." I like how one user called it "non-notable," he obviously wasn't around. Soon enough, none of this information will be around anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.125.220.4 (talk) 02:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)