Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Father Eugeniusz Dutkiewicz SAC Hospice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Father Eugeniusz Dutkiewicz SAC Hospice

 * – ( View AfD View log )

advert of a nn org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lembit Staan (talk • contribs) 00:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete . Not really an advert, it's a charity, not sure if they even make profit, but the topic doesn't seem notable. I nominated it for deletion on pl wiki and will report back if any sources or such are presented (my BEFORe failed to find anything better than a regional portal's coverage of their 30th anniversary,, and another local portal - city news - reporting on their 35th . It's something, but I think it's too local in scope to show notability. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:03, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Changing to weak keep based on sources found during pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2021:07:17:Hospicjum im. Ks. Eugeniusza Dutkiewicza SAC. 1) There is a book dedicated to the history of this organization (Dzieje Pallotyńskiego Hospicjum w Gdańsku. Trzydzieści lat w służbie umierającym 1983–2013), but it is self-published by the org, however it also received an academic review  2) passing mentions in academic articles here and here. Given few more passing mentions similar to the last two sources I see (note: this organization has a long name, which changed over the years, and so you do need to search for a bunch of alt names to get all the hits...) I think it is borderline notable; it has attracted some attention (from local city officials and from scholars of Polish palliative care studies), although one could argue that SIGCOV is not fully met with just a review of book about them and a few paragraphs here and there. Still, in addition to SYSTEMICBIAS, I also believe that we need to be more inclusive towards NGOs than NORG allows in present, hence my vote. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  05:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. Polish Wikipedia AfD linked above has been closed as keep (no delete votes remaining, I nominated it and withdrew after reviewing sources found; two other editors argued for keeping). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:13, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.