Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Father doug


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE ( T + C + CVU ) 00:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Father doug
Article is about someone called Father doug (no last name) who teaches at Northbridge University and writes about sex. Very difficult to verify and article is in poor shape.Capitalistroadster 01:31, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Somewhere between an advert and a bad joke. "is rated by students everywhere as peace full and jack-offable"?!?! Jasmol 01:39, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete any article with the word "jack-offable". Oh and NN.  I'm No Parking and I approved this message 
 * Del per nom (and per No Parking). BD2412  T 03:26, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a speedy as far as I am concerned...absolute nonsense.--MONGO 03:45, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. ERcheck 04:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * DeleteTheRingess 05:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What No Parking said. Mo0 [ talk ] 08:02, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, obvious personal attack page. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 08:53, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. per Private Butcher Ben Aveling 10:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable. His book isn't mentioned on Google. - Mgm|(talk) 10:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as an attack bordering on patent nonsense. Vietnam was not under communist oppresion in 1983 anyway. Turnstep 16:42, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Dang it! All this talk of "speedy delete" made me go read the thing, and now I have to wash my eyeballs!  No, it's not a speedy by my interpretation, but it's a 100% delete.  (I think he's supposed to be a yogi.)  Geogre 17:09, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable, non-notable. Jtmichcock 01:59, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.