Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatih Erden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 19:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Fatih Erden

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. All referenced sources seem to be essentially only to document mere existence or truthfulness rather than notability. (I do not dispute the truthfulness of the article.) The basis of a claim to notability would seem to be as an academic; however, there seems to be no indication of meeting any WP:PROF criteria. The article seems to have been created and maintained essentially by only one editor, Uoi.chi (Talk), who seems to have never edited anything else on Wikipedia until my PROD of the article a few days ago (except to link the birthday of the article's subject to the article – a change which has since been reverted). The only articles currently linked to this one on Wikipedia are the List of people sharing the name "Fatih", the List of Bosniaks, and a new one about a professor, Weng Cho Chew, that was just created by that same user and is tagged for copyright problems. In the latter of these, the subject appears only in a list of people who have worked with the person who is the subject of the article. Megalibgwilia (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Megalibgwilia (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Asst prof having impact commensurate with career stage. WoS show h-index of 3 with top paper (for which the subject is not the corresponding author) having 13 citations. Agricola44 (talk) 18:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC).
 * Delete. Fails WP:PROF. -- 120.23.85.91 (talk) 21:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. His name is common enough to make searches confusing, but he has a Google scholar profile here. It shows that WP:PROF is highly unlikely, and there is no evidence for other notability criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:12, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inadequate depth of coverage, references to reliable sources for notability.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  13:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.