Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatih Istanbullu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 12:20, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Fatih Istanbullu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. He had spoken at some conferences, but nothing notable, as far as I can see. Most material is unsourced, and sources present vary from links to the events where Istanbulu spoke, to Facebook- and Wordpress-entries and WP:SPS. Most work is done by a single user and various IP's (who didn't edit other articles). Tags with concerns for WP:N, WP:TC, WP:BLPPROD and WP:O were deleted by the anon IPs without improving the article. In short, it looks like an ad.Jeff5102 (talk) 19:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 23.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  20:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Trained in hospitality management, but claims to have given university lectures in quantum physics. Nothing of substance in Google news, books, or GS. Deadlinks and facebook pages are the sources, etc. Uncontroversial delete. Agricola44 (talk) 15:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC).
 * Delete for lack of verifiability and lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. The claims of being internationally known as a keynote speaker on advanced scientific topics bring WP:REDFLAG into play, especially as the speaking events verifiable through the links on the article look more like invitations from student religious groups. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:11, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.