Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima Ebrahimi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Less Unless (talk) 09:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Fatima Ebrahimi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Too early in this person's career. TheLawGiverOfDFT (talk) 04:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Citations on GS are negligible. WP:Too soon for WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC).
 * Delete. Fails WP:NPROF. --hroest 13:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NPROF, but did wonder if the media attention for plasma-based rocket propulsion system pushed over the line for WP:GNG... I'm not convinced though. Even if so, might be WP:BIO1E. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Far TOOSOON. Scopus gives her an h-index of 15 and 598 citations, which is not nearly enough for this high-citation field. JoelleJay (talk) 21:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.