Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima III, San Jose del Monte


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to San Jose del Monte. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 03:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Fatima III, San Jose del Monte

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Latest discussion for barangay articles at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive47 and the then-active Articles for deletion/Tarusan, retained the consensus that only barangays that are really notable by reliable sources are considered as worthy to have Wikipedia articles. In other words, barangay notability should be treated through case-to-case basis.

For this barangay, it is unsourced since March 2009, and no one attempted to improve this. It also has an unsourced (and potentially unencyclopedic) list of officials. Much of its information can be incorporated at San Jose del Monte instead. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)  01:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to San_Jose_del_Monte -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:50, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to San Jose del Monte, fails WP:GNG. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 11:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.