Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima Musbah Abbas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Fatima Musbah Abbas

 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Munfarid1 (talk) 17:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reason Munfarid1 (talk) 12:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 13.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 12:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women,  and Africa.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - why should we delete this article?  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hmm doesn't look like she has too many citations, however her L'Oréal-UNESCO award does seem quite significant. Coolcactus04 (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, the deletion proposal was not started by me. As the first editor, I can't really assess, if her award and the selection by a highly competent scientific panel of experts nominated by the UNESCO comittee are sufficient to keep it under WP:GNG. I think she is not primarily noteable for her academic work, but for the outstanding international recognition as a young woman researcher in a country like Sudan and her contribution to food safety there. (A male dominated society with rather limited possibilities for research)- As I have found two secondary sources today, I think the weakness of not citing enough secondary sourcees in my first version of 11 March has been addressed, and the decision about the proposed deletion of 12 March is open to this discussion. - Looking forward to other views here. Munfarid1 (talk) 17:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - Does not meet notability guidelines PastaMonk 17:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete student awards do not show academic notable, and other than that we do not have actual signs of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: The original nominator is the author of this article, and I believe opened this nomination in a malformed attempt to contest User:Onel5969's PROD. In case this is of relevance to the eventual closer. Stifle (talk) 10:58, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel 5969  TT me 11:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.