Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatjon Tafaj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Fatjon Tafaj

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. Contest rationale was based on the age of the article, which has not bearing on notability whatsoever. Sir Sputnik (talk) 09:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following articles for similar reasons. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all - fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all – every single one of them fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY due to minimal media coverage and zero appearances in a fully professional league. – Kosm  1  fent  10:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. 16:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Is first division Albanian league not professional? --Mr. Mario (talk) 22:00, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Professional? Yes. But claims that it is fully professional, as required by WP:NSPORT, have not been supported by reliable sources. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * So the real challenge is to find whether the league is professional or not. UEFA website says nothing. --Mr. Mario (talk) 23:37, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mentoz86 (talk) 03:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.