Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatma Serdar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Fatma Serdar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The entire article is derived from stats pages from Turkish Football Federation and Soccerway. Aside from that, there are two passing mentions on match reports relating to İlkadım Belediyesi Yabancılar Pazarı Spor. Since Serdar has played only in WP:NOTFPL and youth matches, these games do not confer notability and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate stats database. Most of the Google News hits are irrelevant and the rest are passing mentions. A Turkish search came back with no decent WP:RS coverage. WP:GNG does not appear to be met but I'm happy to look at sources if anyone presents any. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:12, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 18:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Without prejudice to change vote to Keep if significant coverage is later found. For my search, I was unable to find WP:SIGCOV for the subject, noting that someone with searching skills for Turkish sources might uncover things I was unable to. Until that point, my vote stands as delete. GauchoDude (talk) 12:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - fails WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 04:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.