Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatwslipochemy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete. Gwernol 21:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Fatwslipochemy
No google hits and it is not in the dictionary, delete per WP:NEO and WP:OR. TeaDrinker 19:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as malarkey. GassyGuy 20:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per existing tag, nonsense NawlinWiki 20:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I had thought about a speedy, but it did not seem to be strictly patent nonsense. If there were some indication of notability, it might be worth including in Wikipedia (although I am not hopeful in this regard. To quote from the article, "It is said that the art form was created by two computer techs who were under a constant barrage of inept theories from their customers.") --TeaDrinker 21:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.