Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faversham House Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:05, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Faversham House Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not an obviously notable company. A search for sources threw up a few passing mentions, but that's it Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately delete - as my searches found no good coverage aside from one interview, business listings and Thefreelibrary. SwisterTwister   talk  18:23, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Basically all original research with a couple typical promotion/COI-type sections sprinkled in on awards and philanthropy. Even if they were notable, it would be best for any editor trying to make an encyclopedic work to start from scratch. CorporateM (Talk) 00:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.