Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawad Hassan Fawad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Störm   (talk)  17:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Fawad Hassan Fawad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seemed non notable person. No additional sourced. HINDWIKI •  CHAT  16:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Adeel Safi (talk) 20:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)The reason given for the deletion tag is that the subject is a non notable. Had HINDWIKI read the references tagged they would have known the prominence of the subject. Please next time make sure you do your research before doing something as big as nominating a page for deletion.
 * Keep he is a prominent bureaucrat in the country who has served as Personal Secretary to Prime Minister of Pakistan. there are numerous press clips online which can be used to curate a bio. This is detailed bio on the subject. --Saqib (talk) 06:56, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Adeel Safi (talk)The subject is a civil servant who is often regarded as one of the most powerful man in the Pakistan Muslim League government. I am attaching several links. Please look into these and if you think that he is a 'notable', please remove the deletion tag from the page. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WG84v2uTowg https://dailytimes.com.pk/81749/leave-of-secretary-to-pm-raises-many-a-questions/ https://tribune.com.pk/story/1399617/bureaucracy-creating-hurdles-says-industries-minister/

Thankyou! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adeel Safi (talk • contribs) 19:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delte This article have no reliable sources per Wikipedia's WP:BLP policy and YouTube is not a additional source because anyone can upload videos on it. HINDWIKI •  CHAT  01:49, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete struck since your nom is already considered your !vote (see Guide_to_deletion). Youtube is neither reliable nor unreliable, though more content on youtube is unreliable than reliable. There's a big difference between using as evidence clips of broadcast news from the official account of a news media source vs a self-published video uploaded by a random with an opinion. (see WP:Video_links) ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 08:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: The move from Draftspace appears to have been irregular, and the article and its sources are not great. On the other hand, the nomination is worse, and is bordering on WP:SK3 speedy close given that one of the sources before the nom was from The Nation, and as Principal Secretary to two PMs he has been a well covered, influential, and controversial figure in English sources (+ Urdu?). The article is currently far blander than coverage suggests is fair weight . ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 14:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per Saqib.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 08:38, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable person. Fails GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:56, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ... which is one of 10 delete !votes made Sportsfan 1234 between 01:55 and 01:59... ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 08:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep for bad nomination and many evidence that the subject is regularly mentioned in Pakistani press. I also see many sources like this related to him. He certainly passes WP:GNG as well known government official. Also the nominator is merely looking for additional sources (per his statement above) and this is wrong place to ask that. There's template for such request like refimprove and many others &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 06:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.