Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawzal number


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Academic Challenger (talk) 21:18, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Fawzal number

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient coverage in reliable sources and academic literature in general, does not meet WP:GNG. The concept appears to have been pioneered in this paper, which according to Google Scholar has been cited 5 times. Based on the content of the article and the abstracts of the relevant papers, it is unclear whether the term "Fawzal number" has ever actually been used outside of wikipedia, even in the papers that developed the concept. It also appears very likely that the initial editor has a conflict of interest, seeing as their username is "Fawzala", and the author of the papers about this concept is A. Fawzal. Comments in edit summaries would appear to indicate that this concept is part of their graduate thesis, which hasn't even been defended yet. Maybe this will one day be the cornerstone of fan cooling theory, but for now it appears to be much WP:TOOSOON. signed,Rosguill talk 04:11, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Not seeing the reliable source coverage to demonstrate notability. PohranicniStraze (talk) 07:45, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient uptake in the literature to demonstrate widespread use or notability. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:04, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not enough coverage from independent sources available. Kraose (talk) 03:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.